Anniversary (2025) – a liberal film

There used to be a time – at some point in the 90s – when you’d see an actor’s name on a poster and you’d immediately know the film was worth watching. Al Pacino. Robert De Niro. Morgan Freeman. Arnold Schwarzenegger. Tom Cruise. Possibly even Sylvester Stallone.

You’d know the film was worth watching because you just knew that – at the time; sadly, things have changed – those actors had a reputation to upheld, so they wouldn’t be caught dead in a shitty film. (alright, alright, Arnold Schwarzenegger as Mister Freeze may have been a bridge too far). Chances were you were in for a future classic.

But then you’ve got the opposite end of the spectrum. You see an actor’s name (or actress, in this case) and you immediately know the film is going to be complete and utter shit. That’s the case for me with Diane Lane, Robert Pattinson or Jennifer Lawrence. It’s not so much that they pick shit parts to play ; it’s more like…if it’s a good film, if it’s a good role/part, you wouldn’t give it to them. If you need a good actor, you might pick Tom Hiddleston, Christian Bale…you know, someone who can act. But if they read the script, snorted and said “hard pass” and you’re still determined to make the film, well, who are you going to call? You need someone who looks forward to stooping to new lows and sometimes, just sometimes, Nicholas Cage is simply unavailable.

That’s the case with Anniversary. The film is so incredibly stupid (there’d be a “spoilers alert” here if I thought anything could “spoil” the film, but seeing how it’s a rotten piece of shit, I fail to see how anyone could harm it further) that no self-respecting actor would want to be in it. But you signed a contract with the studio, the film HAS TO be made. So you call Diane Lane. She’ll do it.

As I said before, I have no political affiliation. I respect Onlyfans subscribers more than I respect people who “identify” with a political party. So from that point of view, I like to think I’m…neutral. Tories, Labour, they’re the same to me. I can’t be bothered to go and vote simply because it feels like having to choose between being strangled to death and being shot in the head. If it’s all the same to you, I’ll skip the foreplay. It’s the same when it comes to “liberals” and “conservatives”, generally speaking, but it’s impossible to watch this film and not start hating “liberals”, simply because it’s so fucking stupid.

So here’s the rundown of the “story”.

Ellen Taylor (Diane Lane) is a “respected” (nobody knows why) professor at Georgetown University. She’s married to Paul, a restaurant owner. It’s their 25th wedding anniversary. The entire family (along with some illustrious nobodies) is gathered around them, at a LOOONG table set in their HUGE garden, next to their huge fucking mansion in a nice neighbourhood. The family consists of everything you’d expect to see in a film made by liberals. Allow me to walk you through it.

• Cynthia. Married to Rob, a black dude. They’re both “environmental lawyers”. Whatever the fuck that means.
• Anna. A lesbian who’s supposed to be a famous (?) comedian.
• Birdie. The youngest daughter, who’s supposedly working on becoming “a scientist”, because why not. Birdie’s sort-of dating an Asian guy who goes by “Moses” – Moses Ho to be precise. You know, Moses, a very popular name in China or Vietnam (because I don’t know any other countries where Ho would be a common last name)
• Josh. The only son, a failed writer who is also apparently a loser.

Now, you may have raised an eyebrow when I mentioned that Rob was black. “Why does that matter?”. Well here’s why: in a family with 3 white daughters, the writers simply couldn’t bring themselves to have ONE of them married/dating a white guy. Not one. One is a lesbian. Another one is married to a black dude. The last one is seeing an Asian guy. ANYTHING.BUT.A.WHITE.GUY. That’s how you know you’re watching a film made by liberals: any young white woman will be shown to be dating/sleeping with literally ANYTHING (bears included) except another white man. As we all know, we – white men – are quite literally the spawn of Satan. It’s the sort of “inclusivity” that excludes the majority. I wish I could say this surprised me, but of course it didn’t because, well – Diane Lane.

We’re introduced to “the antagonist”. In this case, it’s Liz – Josh’s girlfriend. But ah, Liz isn’t JUST any girl. No, you see…she was Ellen Taylor’s student! Woah! Unfortunately, Liz had some wild theories – supposedly against some “democratic” principles (I’ll cover the “democracy” scam in a future post, so let’s not delve into that right now). She didn’t like the system – two parties, yada yada. So Ellen branded her a fascist, made her life at Georgetown University a nightmare and well, would you believe it, Liz was forced to transfer elsewhere. She did, however, keep her ideas and she’s going to write them down in a book – a book named “Change” (or the Change, who cares).

Ellen has no regrets over how she treated Liz in the past; quite the opposite in fact. She comes out shooting – accusing Liz of dating her son just go somehow “get to her”. Of course it’s completely absurd, but whatever.

Ellen also has this upcoming interview, where she’s supposed to “defend” the university. You see, there are accusations that the university campus is a Marxist cesspool, so Ellen stands by her employers during an interview, powerfully stating that the campus is not monolithic; this is mad funny, as it happens right after Ellen admitted that she pretty much ostracized Liz, shamed her, complained about her to the dean, until Liz had no choice but to transfer.

Hmmm, where did we hear these accusations before? Oh, that’s right:

(don’t ask me why Google claims that Donald Trump is a “former President”; as I’m writing this, it’s the 15th of December 2025 and he’s still the president of the United States, as far as I know; perhaps Google knows that the next hitman will get the job done, who knows?).

The dog whistle has been blown, just in case you weren’t 100% sure; yep, it’s one of those films: TrUmP bAd! RePuBLiCaNs bAd!

So it’s the anniversary party and we’ve got a nice shot of Paul (the husband) with his speech – hilarious, by the way – with part of the house in the background. Just a part, because the house literally can’t fit into this frame:

…just to be clear, you know, it’s that kind of house. Paul has this heart-warming story. 25 years ago, he was a broke cook and he met Ellen at the Museum of Art (where else would two liberals meet, eh?). They were staring at a painting

…and, as liberals staring at paintings would do, they fell in love and here we are. A future professor and a broke cook, who – as liberals do – did rather well; keeping 4 children in college, getting that house we can sort-of-see in the background…you know.

As the day goes on, Ellen and Josh are walking through a forest and Josh bitterly complains that his mother treats him as one of her students, because he’s not wildly successful, like his three sisters.

We need to break here for a moment, because there are many ways one could describe the three daughters, but “wildly successful” is not one of them, because…here’s the thing.

• Rob (Cynthia’s husband, the black dude, environmental laywer) is at some point in awe of what appears to be a Porsche Taycan GTS Sport Turismo. That car (the 2026 model) costs around $152,000. Two “wildly successful” lawyers would consider it “mid” at best. I mean, it’s a Porsche Taycan, not a Bugatti La Voiture Noire for the love of all that’s holy.

• Anna – the lesbian comedian – is so wildly successful that she’s quite literally getting beaten up by the audience at her first gig. If that’s the definition of wildly successful, I’d rather be a loser.

• Birdie – the youngest daughter – appears to be a student. A future scientist, apparently – because we’re able to see her staring at some virus or bacteria or whatever using a microscope. She’s got one, clearly she’s the next Einstein. How a student who’s just using a microscope (something we were doing in school on a weekly basis between the ages of 9 and 16) could be considered wildly successful is anyone’s best guess.

As such, it’s difficult to guess what Josh was thinking of when he complained about his wildly successful sisters. I for one couldn’t guess. But, you know, Josh is white heterosexual man, it’s a liberal film, so obviously Josh has to be a loser, a nazi, scum of the Earth.

Either way, Liz published her dumb theories that ended up with her being forced out of Georgetown University; the book is called (the) Change, advocating for a one-party state, which I’m sure would be terribly popular literally nowhere on the planet. The book is incredibly successful, being described as a “cultural phenomenon”. We’re told it sold 10M copies and we later find out it was sold on Amazon for $32.99. As a result, Liz becomes hugely influential and “Change” becomes that one-party that rules the United States.

We need to stop here for a moment just to appreciate how fucking divorced from reality the people who made this film are. You see, I like books. I always did. It was the one “luxury” I had (if borrowing books from a library can be considered a luxury), growing up in a fairly poor family, in a communist country. Computers weren’t a thing there. Mobile phones didn’t exist (never mind smartphones). “Fun” meant going out with friends (doing absolutely nothing even remotely intelligent), playing football, reading and watching cartoons (30 minutes per week, on Sundays, on the only TV station that existed). Having moved from country to country (and after a lot of pain and studying and various sob-stories we’re not going to get into), I ended up making enough money to buy my own books, so I still do that from time to time. Here’s a hint for you:

That’s how much a book costs – one written by the winner of the Nobel Prize in Literature, mind you, not a random nobody. Not $32.99.

Then…10M copies…a cultural phenomenon? One of J.K.Rowling’s books (Harry Potter-and-the-whatever-who-cares) sold over 8M copies IN ONE DAY in the United States. The population of the United States? Close to 350M – not counting illegal immigrants. 10M copies means “less than 3% of the population”. While selling 10M copies would be “very successful” (for a book) it would in a no way be a “cultural phenomenon”. But that’s how divorced from reality the writers are.

Getting back to the film, Ellen is seriously angry with the book’s success – so much so that she vandalizes a neighbour’s US flag. She is unfortunately recorded by a camera, the video is posted somewhere online, so her career as a professor is pretty much over. As her husband plays the ever-so-understanding-idiot, merely asking her “it’s a flag, what were you thinking?”, Ellen “powerfully” states “please don’t call it that”, implying that it’s more than a flag. It’s obviously a symbol of something Ellen hates.

It’s funny, because, you know, the liberal media keeps pushing this nonsense. Here, in the UK, we’ve constantly got articles like:

…because, apparently, your country’s flag is some sort of “far right” symbol. In England – where we don’t have “any right”, never mind “far right”. The flag is supposedly scary to immigrants. As an immigrant, I can’t say I’m scared of it. Quite frankly, I see nothing wrong with it. It’s a pretty nice flag, overall and I find it reassuring that some people at least know which country they’re in. There’s nothing wrong with being proud of your country, so I’m not bothered by seeing England’s flag at all. But some people in the US have had issues with flags for as long as I can remember. I remember this thing from an old film – one I can’t name at the moment – where anti-Vietnam protesters were burning the US flag. IN THE US. I remember thinking at the time “wtf is wrong with you, if you hate the country enough to burn its flag, just … fucking leave?”. Don’t get me wrong, I fully support hating politicians, political parties, various doctrines etc, but a country’s flag is not a symbol of a political party. It’s something else. To me, it’s a reminder that many people have died to we can live in relative peace (and a distant memory of freedom). People have died so that we can be angry with politicians without being summarily executed for it. That’s about it.

The liberal flag psychosis/hate is weird to me. These guys watch a crowd of students waving Palestinian flags – no problem. They watch Israelis with their flags – no problem. They watch the Pride parade with their flags – no problem. They watch St Patrick’s day with Irish flags – no problem. They watch all sorts of south-American and central-American flags in Los Angeles – NO PROBLEM. It’s all cool. The moment someone waves a US flag in the United fucking States, they scream bloody murder. I don’t get it. Surely most US institutions would fly the US flag? What are you going to do, start raging every single time you go outside?

Aaaaanyway, back to the film.

The book is a cultural phenomenon (as understood by liberals). Ellen loses her job over the flag incident. She’s kind of “blacklisted” – also due to the book. 2 years later, the US basically embraced “the change” and is now a one-party state.

The liberal mind cannot comprehend the absurdity of the script, but, for comparison purposes, here’s a short read on very simple and very local problem, not even at a national level: San Francisco’s Millennium Tower. For those of you who are too lazy to read it, it’s a sinking & tilting tower. It’s been an ongoing issue since 2009 – that’s 16 years. To fix a tower – and it’s STILL “not really” fixed. Only a liberal would imagine the political landscape changing that radically in two years at a national level AND …that happening because of a … book. BROOOO, IT TAKES 20 FUCKING YEARS TO BUILD A ROAD, WTF ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT????

Here’s what you need to know about books and politics – I’ll keep it simple. Quite literally ZERO dictators ever came to power on the back of a book. NONE. EVER. Yes, there have been dictators who supposedly wrote books (presumably everyone knows what a ghostwriter is, so we’ll just smile at the concept). Examples include Hitler with Mein Kampf and Gaddafi with The Green Book; HOWEVER, both were written AFTER they already had power. The thing about books and dictators is that in order to BECOME a dictator, you need the support of the masses and the thing about the masses is that … they don’t fucking read. Either because they can’t or because they’re not the type of person who reads. Most people who enjoy a good book simply will not support a dictator. The concepts are not compatible. It’s that simple. You may get a following as a popular writer, but getting anywhere – politically speaking? It’s out of the question. But, again, it’s a script written by liberals. What can you do? That’s how the liberal mind works. “I don’t know jack shit about life, history or whatever, but I’m going to take a guess at how things work and I’m just going to try to sound convincing, that has to work”. It’s how this entire film goes.

White girls good (except for Liz). White men bad, stupid, incompetent (the verb has been omitted on purpose). How does a cook pick up a future professor? The simple answer is: he doesn’t. But in this film, they bond and fall in love while staring at a painting in a museum. What makes someone wildly successful? They’re either an “environmental” lawyer, a student or the type of stand-up comedian who gets beaten up at their first gig. How do you end up in power and change the world? You write a fucking book, of course – like everyone else who took over the most powerful country of the day, right, guys? But I’ll show them. Write a book, become a dictator? Just wait until I get 10 likes and you’ll see what my machete-wielding army will do.

There are now “Change census” committees running around the country, blackmailing and threatening people in order for them to register as a “Change home”. Dissenters are silenced, jailed, “disappeared” – much like Anna, the lesbian comedian. What we see is that she’s getting booed and beaten by the audience. Mind you, not a single person is laughing at her comedy show. Wildly successful, guys, I can see why Josh was upset.

Basically, Anna’s idea of comedy is to insult the audience, accusing them of buying that book, which caused the “change”, which is pure fascism, silencing “intellectuals” and thinkers; she then tells the audience not to worry, because they’re safe; you know, the type of joke that you’d expect from a female comedian. She continues with:

…before being beaten up and forced to flee. For some reason, the police are now looking for her and she has to disappear. We get that because she’s shown swimming to shore at dusk. I can only guess that the audience chased her all the way to the nearest river.

But that’s the ONE part the writers did get right: female comedians and their shows. 0 entertainment. 0 fun. 0 anything, 100% political bullshit nobody wants to hear. Also “my vagina” & “my period” “jokes”. We get it, you’re a woman. Thanks.

It’s a shame, really, because prior to her somewhat forced disappearance, Anna was having a lot of fun bragging to her sister about how she was fucking her assistant (just in case anyone failed to realise that the butch lady brought over to what appears to be a Thanksgiving dinner was her “squeeze” and not a random friend; you know, it’s a liberal film, they HAVE TO hammer the point, SHE’S A LESBIAN, A LESBIAN, GUYS – just in case anyone in the back failed to notice). But, of course, she was also getting ready to fire the assistant because she had learned that the assistant thought some of those “change” ideas were interesting.

It’s hilarious, really, because just prior to getting boo(t)ed off the stage, Anna was telling the public that thinking is no longer allowed and “change” was going to come after the intellectual and the thinkers. I mean, you have to appreciate the irony. Her mother pretty much chased Liz out of university because she didn’t like her ideas. Anna herself wants to fire her assistant (the one she’s “fucking”, yes, whatever that may mean for lesbians) because she likes a book. Yet Anna is oh-so-worried about the “Change” movement coming after thinkers and intellectuals. OK, comrade Mao, thanks for the warning, I guess.

It’s not quite clear why the police (or rather the state) would be after Anna – a humiliated/failed comedian, but we do learn that she’s now “in hiding”, whatever that means for liberals. We can only assume that dissenters are severely punished. Either that or the LGBT community is at risk (oh, gee, when are they NOT at risk?)

Fast forward a few years; Liz and Josh have twin boys. These twin boys are mostly looked after by a babysitter called Gerda. A black woman, handpicked because she speaks German, French and Mandarin (and English, of course), as most black women do (in liberal films). Completely realistic, I myself know a couple thousands of those.

But ah, Gerda is not what she seems to be. While Ellen and Paul know nothing of their beloved Anna, Gerda gives her phone to Ellen; it’s Anna, over a videocall, reassuring her mother that she’s safe etc and that Gerda is “with them”. Because of course she is. Cue the Sex and the City “and just like that…”

Oh, right, Josh. Josh, introduced as a guy with a sad beard and glasses in his loser phase has now fully embraced the “movement” and is somehow some “big shot” (or not?). He shaved his beard and no longer needs glasses. So, anyway, men, if you’re having trouble with your eyesight, just fucking shave, you fucking bears. Easy liberal cure. In fact, not only did he change his look, he now appears to be a bit of a Nazi himself. If you happened to watch “the man in the high castle” (the Amazon series), you might remember Joe and his Nazi buddies in Berlin, all wearing those fancy suits. That’s exactly what Josh now wears (as well as seemingly most men). Just to drive the point home for the liberals who still didn’t get what the rest of us understood after the first 10 minutes: they’re Republicans, guys and therefore Nazis.

We witness a scene where Josh tells Paul that he knows that his restaurant is in trouble and that he took a second mortgage on the house to try to keep it going. Josh offers to help, but Paul doesn’t want his son’s help, because, well, Paul can see that Josh is a Nazi, you know. There are too many “facepalm” moments in this film, but this one HAS TO be in the top 10.

So we’ve got this couple – the chef and the restaurant owner (not a simple cook anymore!) and the (now unemployed) professor (of gender studies, I guess?). Paul just took out a second mortgage, but Ellen doesn’t know about it; Josh, however, knows about it. Clearly Josh is now connected, you know. Hey, what do a bankrupt restaurateur and an unemployed professor with TWO mortgages and a daughter in hiding do every year? That’s right boys: they throw parties. Anniversary. Thanksgiving. Anything and everything. Because fuck money, right?

Downsizing? Forget about it. Getting other jobs? Ah, no can do, because the “Change” movement is mean to them or something. Sell? Move? Hell no. PARTY. AFTER. PARTY. No problem.

But you know, we forgot about Cynthia – mostly because she’s so irrelevant. But it’s a liberal film, she’s going to get her day. Her day in the spotlight comes at one of these parties. Rob proudly lets everyone know that Cynthia is pregnant. Or, as he puts it, “we’re pregnant”. Dude, you’re a black man. You can’t be pregnant. Fat, perhaps, but pregnant? No. That’s something women do. But ah, Rob is in for a surprise. You see, Cynthia can’t picture herself as a mother. So “last week” (without Rob’s knowledge) she had an abortion. She’s not actually pregnant – not anymore. She was going to tell Rob, but…

I did warn you it was a liberal film, didn’t I? In a liberal film, there’s no room for questions such as:

• excuse me, but did you guys think about discussing whether you wanted children or not BEFORE getting married?
• right, let’s assume that you DIDN’T want children – just you, never mind Rob, who clearly did; did you hear about this insane new concept called, erm, contraception? Like, I don’t know, if you were to go behind his back, you could have an IUD, you could take pills – he’d never know anyway. So why did you get pregnant if you didn’t want children? Did you hear that abortion felt amazing and you simply HAD TO experience it for yourself?
• right, let’s assume that you were in two minds at the start of the relationship, but changed your mind later on; would it be too much to ask you to let your FUCKING HUSBAND know – as opposed to the “surprise, I had an abortion, lol”? I guess so. It’s a liberal film, guys, men – husbands or not – have no say in this sort of thing.

Anyway, Rob takes off, leaving her – as far as we can tell. We’re done with Cynthia – the wildly successful environmental lawyer. Here’s to hoping Rob will find a decent woman who’s not completely out of her mind, best of luck to him, he appears to be a lovely, easygoing chap.

Meanwhile, Liz is apparently “grooming” Birdie, the youngest one – by offering her a sought-after job as a scientist. Ellen is furious. Clearly Liz is trying to groom and destroy ANOTHER ONE of her children!

Birdie did get her moment in the spotlight earlier, as she and Moses Ho – the Asian dude – were walking around at night taking down “Change” signs and vandalizing neighbourhood properties, as good liberals do, but never mind that.

Another year has passed. Liz and Josh are once again visiting Ellen and Paul, because – you guessed it – there’s another party. What else but throw parties could an unemployed couple with two mortgages do? Right? Right, guys? Guys? Gu-

But anyway, Liz suddenly goes to Ellen. She’s terrified of Josh. But Ellen tells her off “YOUR husband, NOT MY son!”. The US translation of “you’ve made your bed, sleep in it”. It’s not quite clear why, but Liz is absolutely terrified of Josh now – the father of her twins. This makes no sense and will make even less sense by the time the film ends, no worries.

A silent clown joins the party. He or she does a few “tricks” a drunk Labrador could do and then runs into the house – as uninvited clowns often do at parties. Nobody bats an eye. You guessed it: it’s Anna, who sneaked in to talk to Birdie for some reason. Alas, Birdie isn’t there. Angry at her family, angry at Anna, angry at Change, Birdie decided to suicide-bomb the corporation backing Change. She does that, killing a bunch of people (and herself) in the process, which is perfectly normal in a liberal film.

Basically, the writers picked the ONE demographic that never did that kind of shit. Because why not? As I told my friend during an ongoing terrorist attack in London a while ago “I’ll bet it’s one of those white nuns who scream Hail Mary before detonating…again”.

Paul notices Anna in the house and he picks up his phone, simply stating “she’s here”. To whom? Presumably someone who had been expecting that call for years – since Anna’s disappearance. Someone who also knew where “here” was. Someone who also guessed who “she” was. Alas, Cynthia is behind her evil brother and she dutifully stabs him in the stomach. Paul, no longer able to stand up, leans against a wall, awaiting his inevitable end.

A number of … state-backed troops, I’m guessing show up to capture Anna (and her family, guilty by association). They manage to come up with 2 white rags which they pull over Ellen’s and Paul’s heads for no apparent reason, as one could see through them anyway. But, in case you missed it, it’s literally peak romance according to liberals, because this is what they look like:

Just like Les Amants – the famous painting, guys! You know? No, you don’t, you uncultured swines. You would’ve known if you were liberals – because you would’ve picked up chicks at the Museum of Art.

As for the erm…”police” or whatever these guys are, yes, that’s what they look like. Orange, guys. Because you’re not a liberal unless you’re also ham-fisted about literally fucking everything. Orange. Hold on, let me check this.

(thanks, Captain-Obvious-GPT)

The entire film is little more than liberal psychosis. Trump being the end of all things. The end of freedom. Wildly successful lesbian comedians are beaten up and chased into hiding, guys! Innocent professors desecrating the US flags are left unemployed! The injustices just keep on piling up 🙁 Will it never end?

But it ends. It ends as Josh – who’s been bleeding against the wall for around 10 minutes now stands up and acts tough with the orange forces, whoever the fuck they are. He doesn’t want his parents to be left alone, just to be kept together. The lead-orange-man basically tells him to fuck off (in a polite way), but Josh won’t have it. “Do you know who I am?”. It becomes apparent that the lead-orange-man has no clue, as he dutifully orders his subordinates to put him down. Josh bravely fights him (never mind him dying leaning against a wall for the past 10 minutes, he’s now fighting off two trained (and armed) militiamen of sorts). No problem, that makes sense.

Liz, however, tells the orange dudes to take Josh too, because he’s “with them”. The lead-orange-guy simply responds with “yes, ma’am”, showing deference. Clearly Liz is the big shot, which “makes sense” (in the liberal mind) as she wrote the book. As a closing shot, with the entire Taylor family either dead or dragged away, Liz coldly stares at a picture displaying the Taylors in happier times. I guess she got her revenge. If pissing Ellen off by marrying what can at best be described as a “beta male” and carrying his children is revenge. It probably made sense to the script writer – I’m betting on a combination of MDMA and good old weed in this case.

The irony of the film is that it manages to do exactly what it’s trying not to. The “do-gooder” liberals come across as little more than traitors. They’re guilty of quite literally everything they’re accusing the other side of doing. Ellen and Anna see no problem with decrying not being allowed to think anymore, while they’re either kicking out students of university for having the wrong ideas (Ellen) or preparing to fire the assistant for liking the wrong party (Anna). Birdie, the “little innocent scientist” ends up bombing a building and killing people (after her little stroll with her dutiful Asian dude vandalizing the neighbourhood just to one-up dear mommy who settled for ONE flag).

I guess I skipped over the joyous moment during which Birdie and Anna talk about the pilgrims, so picture this scene:

Liz: “Thanksgiving, right? Our heritage is so important”

Birdie: “The colonizers were actually wolves in sheep’s clothing who brought smallpox blankets and a deadly plague that ravaged the Indigenous people”

Anna: “Hell yeah, Birdie! Yes. Up top. Not to mention racist as fuck, but, you know, tradition”

Joyous liberal laughter ensues, high-fives all around, while Liz stares at them.

(in case you’ve been living under a rock, that’s partially true; the colonists did in fact bring with them various diseases they carried, diseases for which they had naturally developed antibodies; diseases that were harmless to them, but deadly to the indigenous population that hadn’t been exposed to those germs before)

It’s a liberal script, guys. It’s perfectly normal for broke couples to organize Thanksgiving dinners, then happily clap as their children shit all over Thanksgiving. Also, in case you missed it, people were racist in 1619. Not sure if you were aware of it. Do you understand? RACIST. Also, they decimated the innocent Indigenous population. It’s difficult to imagine what the problem was, why they couldn’t get along. It probably wasn’t related to this, though.

I’m not a US citizen (in fact, I have nothing to do with the US, so whoever’s “in charge” of the US makes no difference to me), but Liberals will have a field day with this film. So will Conservatives, just for different reasons. Because, you see, it’s this sort of inept bullshit force-fed to the public on a daily basis that made Donald Trump president. It’s the same sort of inept liberal bullshit that will make J.D Vance president as well.

As much as the director may have tried, every single member of that family comes across as deeply unpleasant. They betray everyone – their country, society, their husbands, their employees.

But somehow they’re the good guys and the victims. How so?

Well…it’s a liberal film. The same rules apply if you – like anyone with a brain – were going to ask “wait, why is Liz desperate and crying, begging Ellen for help because Josh is dangerous when she can literally command the militia to take him away?”. IT’S A LIBERAL FILM. DON’T FUCKING ASK QUESTIONS.

As credits rolled, I could only draw the logical conclusion:

PS Feel free to hate me for this post. But no, I’m not a “Republican”. Or a “Conservative”. I’m not a “Liberal” or a “Democrat” either. I’m as apolitical as they come, just because I don’t believe either of those sides are on MY side. If I’m “bashing” this film, it’s not because the events shown there are against my political beliefs. It’s because NOTHING. MADE. ANY. FUCKING. SENSE. Then again, Diane Lane was on the poster…